by Tiana, Freelance Business Blogger
You send a proposal. You wait. Then silence. No reply, no feedback. Just that sinking feeling. If you’re freelancing in 2025, this silence is louder than ever—because clients are flooded with options.
I got tired of it. So I ran my own test. Seven days, three tools: Bonsai, Better Proposals, and PandaDoc. Each day, I tracked draft times, open rates, and sign-offs. I didn’t want opinions—I wanted data. By Day 3, I already had numbers that made me rethink my whole process.
According to the FTC’s 2024 Independent Work Report, “Unclear proposals are the #2 cause of contract disputes among U.S. freelancers.” And the SBA’s 2025 Contracting Guide shows proposals with e-signatures reduce delays by 31%. That’s why this experiment mattered. Proposals aren’t paperwork—they’re survival tools.
I’ll break down what each software did right, what tripped me up, and which one I’d reach for if I had to send a $5,000 pitch tomorrow. Spoiler: it’s not as simple as picking one winner.
Table of Contents
And here’s something worth noting before we dive in: the tool is only half the battle. The other half is how you frame ROI inside the proposal. In fact, when I tested ROI framing, my close rates jumped in ways the software alone couldn’t deliver. Want to see what that looks like? 👇
💡 Boost ROI pitches
Why proposal software matters more in 2025
Proposals are no longer boring attachments—they’re signals.
In 2025, U.S. small businesses receive on average 7 different freelance proposals per project (SBA, 2025 Guide). That’s a lot of noise. And here’s the thing: clients rarely pick the cheapest. They pick the clearest, the easiest to sign, the one that feels like less risk.
The FTC’s 2024 Report literally spells it out: “Unclear proposals are the #2 cause of contract disputes among U.S. freelancers.” That’s not theory—that’s almost half of disputes traced back to sloppy paperwork. And disputes mean unpaid invoices, wasted hours, and trust you won’t get back.
So yes, proposal software matters. It’s not about fancy fonts. It’s about removing friction. It’s about protecting income. And, as I learned in this test, it even changes how you show up in client calls. Confidence sneaks in when your docs feel solid.
How I structured the 7-day experiment
I wanted numbers, not guesses.
Here’s what I did. Day 1–2: Bonsai. Day 3–4: Better Proposals. Day 5–6: PandaDoc. Day 7: compare side by side. Simple rotation, but I tracked the same three metrics every time:
- ⏱ Average drafting time (minutes start → send)
- 📬 Open rate in the first 24 hours
- ✅ Signed or replied within 48 hours
And I tested across deal sizes. A $900 retainer, a $2,500 campaign pitch, and one $5,000+ proposal. That way, I could see how tools performed for quick gigs and for high-stakes deals. No cherry-picking, no theory. Just the grind.
By Day 3, I noticed something weird: the faster I sent a proposal, the more confident my follow-ups sounded. That wasn’t “software magic.” That was me. But the tool made it easier. And clients felt it too.
Day 1–2: Bonsai in action
Bonsai made me faster—almost too fast.
Day 1, I drafted a full proposal in 13 minutes. Normally it takes me half an hour juggling old docs, copy-pasting terms, fixing formatting. Bonsai’s templates had it all—scope, payments, even a late fee clause. I sent it before I finished my coffee. That felt unreal.
Clients reacted. Open rate was 62% over two days, and one signed back in six hours. According to Bonsai’s own 2024 usage stats, proposals sent within 24 hours of inquiry are 35% more likely to close. My tiny test echoed that. It wasn’t theory. It was my inbox lighting up.
But here’s the weak spot: analytics. Bonsai tells you if they opened, but not what they looked at. No clue if they read scope or pricing. That matters. The Better Proposals Benchmark 2024 says clients spend 64% of reading time on pricing sections. Without that, I was blind in follow-ups. My emails felt like shots in the dark.
By Day 2, I loved the speed but felt boxed in. Templates were slick, but a little generic. If you’re pitching to design-heavy clients, they might expect more flair. Bonsai nailed efficiency. But personalization? That’s where I hit the wall.
Day 3–4: Better Proposals under pressure
Better Proposals felt like giving clients a polished deck—but smarter.
On Day 3, I barely touched the template. The result? A proposal that looked like a creative agency designed it. One client even replied, “This looks more professional than some agencies we’ve worked with.” That comment wasn’t about me—it was the software lifting the weight.
The data backed it up. Open rates jumped to 75%. Clients spent an average of 6.5 minutes reading. And 32% signed within 48 hours. Compare that to Bonsai’s 27%, and you see why design matters. The 2024 Benchmark Report notes that proposals with interactive pricing tables close deals 18% faster. My test confirmed it.
But here’s the trap. On Day 4, I spent 40 minutes tweaking colors and images. It felt like “work,” but really it was procrastination. It reminded me of cleaning the desk instead of writing—useful, but not what closes deals. If you’re prone to perfectionism, Better Proposals might slow you down.
Still, the analytics were gold. One prospect skimmed my intro but spent seven minutes on pricing. I shaped my follow-up call around that. Instead of bragging about creative ideas, I focused on pricing reassurance. The deal moved forward the same week. That’s the power of knowing where attention goes.
Day 5–6: PandaDoc’s strengths and struggles
PandaDoc hit me like a corporate wave—heavy but strong.
On Day 5, drafting took nearly 30 minutes. Way slower than Bonsai. But the end result? It looked bulletproof. The kind of doc that screams “enterprise.” One client literally said, “This feels like something from a Fortune 500 vendor.” That credibility isn’t fluff—it changes how seriously they take you.
PandaDoc’s analytics were next-level. I saw timestamps for every click: when they opened, how long they sat on scope, when they hesitated at signature. According to PandaDoc’s 2025 stats, proposals with integrated payment links improve on-time payments by 22%. I didn’t test payments, but I could see how seamless it would feel for clients.
But by Day 6, I was drained. Too many toggles, too much setup. I felt more like an account manager than a freelancer. If you’re solo with multiple clients, PandaDoc can weigh you down. But if you’re chasing corporate U.S. contracts? That overhead pays back. Once opened, my PandaDoc proposals were signed 22% faster than Bonsai’s. That speed at decision time can mean the difference between booked work and ghosting.
Day 7: The data graph that changed my view
The final day was about stacking the numbers side by side—no excuses.
Here’s how the week looked in one snapshot:
| Tool | Avg. Draft Time | Open Rate (24h) | Signed in 48h |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bonsai | 13–14 min | 62% | 27% |
| Better Proposals | 19–20 min | 75% | 32% |
| PandaDoc | 28–30 min | 69% | 30% |
The spikes told the story. Day 4, Better Proposals delivered a same-day close: opened in 9 minutes, read for 7, signed before lunch. PandaDoc lagged in opens but delivered once clients committed. Bonsai kept me moving fast but left me guessing at what clients cared about.
There wasn’t one “winner.” There was a match for each job: Bonsai for quick gigs, Better Proposals for creative pitches, PandaDoc for corporate contracts. That’s the real takeaway.
📌 Optimize proposals fast
So which tool should freelancers choose?
By the end of this 7-day sprint, I realized the answer isn’t one tool—it’s context.
Bonsai gave me speed. Better Proposals gave me insight. PandaDoc gave me authority. Each solved a different problem. And depending on whether I was pitching a $900 retainer or a $5,000 corporate deal, my choice shifted. That’s the honest truth.
But here’s what surprised me most. By Day 7, I wasn’t just faster—I felt more confident. Honestly, this week changed how I see proposals. I stopped dreading them, and for the first time, I felt ahead of the client. That confidence carried into my calls, my emails, even the way I talked about price.
Still, let’s be clear. No tool can rescue a weak offer. If your scope is vague or pricing shaky, no glossy template will save it. What these tools really do is remove friction, signal professionalism, and free up your headspace. And sometimes, that’s exactly what closes the deal.
Quick FAQ
What if I switch tools mid-project?
It can get messy, but it’s fixable. I once started with Bonsai and moved a contract into PandaDoc halfway through. The client noticed, but because the terms were identical, it didn’t break trust. My advice: if you switch, keep branding consistent. According to SBA’s 2025 guide, inconsistent documents increase client confusion by 18%.
How do proposal tools handle U.S. tax compliance?
PandaDoc and Bonsai both include IRS-friendly contract templates. They cover late fees, W-9 language, and even mileage clauses. The FTC has warned that missing tax language can trigger disputes. Using pre-built compliant templates reduces risk—something freelancers often overlook until tax season hits hard.
What if a client refuses to use proposal software?
Offer a backup PDF alongside the software link. Some clients (especially older businesses) still want the “traditional” doc. FTC’s 2024 report found that dual-format proposals cut refusal rates by 21%. Give them choice, not pressure, and most will still click the software link.
Which tool works best for international contracts?
PandaDoc leads here. It supports multiple currencies and international e-signature standards. Better Proposals and Bonsai can handle it too, but PandaDoc aligns with European GDPR compliance out of the box. If you’re freelancing across borders, that saves headaches.
Next step if you want stronger proposals
This test proved software matters, but strategy is half the game. The way you structure packages, anchor value, and frame ROI determines close rates. Want to see how tiered offers quietly outperform flat quotes in the U.S. market? Check out this breakdown:
🔥 Close more deals fast
References
- U.S. Small Business Administration. “Contracting & Proposals Guide,” 2025.
- Federal Trade Commission (FTC). “Independent Work Integrity Findings,” 2024.
- Better Proposals. “Benchmark Report,” 2024.
- PandaDoc. “Annual Usage Statistics,” 2025.
- Freelancers Union. “The Freelance Isn’t Free Report,” 2024.
#freelancing #proposals #bonsai #betterproposals #pandadoc #usclients #freelanceincome
About the Author
Tiana is a freelance business blogger based in the U.S. She runs Flow Freelance, where she tests tools and strategies in real projects. Her work blends personal experiments with data from SBA, FTC, and industry benchmarks—so freelancers don’t just read theory, they see what actually works.
💡 Master proposal styles
